“DOMA undermines both the public and private significance of state-sanctioned same-sex marriages; for it tells those couples, and all the world, that their otherwise valid marriages are unworthy of federal recognition. This places same-sex couples in an unstable position of being in a second-tier marriage. The differentiation demeans the couple, whose moral and sexual choices the Constitution protects, see Lawrence, 539 U. S. 558, and whose relationship the State has sought to dignify. And it humiliates tens of thousands of children now being raised by same-sex couples. The law in question makes it even more difficult for the children to understand the integrity and closeness of their own family and its concord with other families in their community and in their daily lives.”– Justice Kennedy
Plain English take on Hollingsworth v. Perry, the challenge to the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage: After the two same-sex couples filed their challenge to Proposition 8 in federal court in California, the California government officials who would normally have defended the law in court, declined to do so. So the proponents of Proposition 8 stepped in to defend the law, and the California Supreme Court (in response to a request by the lower court) ruled that they could do so under state law. But today the Supreme Court held that the proponents do not have the legal right to defend the law in court. As a result, it held, the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the intermediate appellate court, has no legal force, and it sent the case back to that court with instructions for it to dismiss the case.
“What this means, in plain terms, is that same-sex couples who are legally married will be entitled to equal treatment under federal law– with regard to, for example, income taxes and Social Security benefits.”
“The Ninth Circuit was without jurisdiciton to consider the appeal. The judgment of the Ninth Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”
“We have never before upheld the standing of a private party to defend the constitutionality of a state statute when state officials have chosen not to. We decline to do so for the first time here.”
And from everyone’s favorite spokesperson, George Takei:
Today marks a watershed moment in history and a tremendous victory for the principle of equality. The 5-4 decision by our Supreme Court striking down DOMA affirms the universality of love–the desire of all people not only to find, but to value and affirm, a lifelong commitment to another person. I have lived nearly four score years, and have borne witness to both the heartbreak and promise of true justice and equality in America. Today my heart soars, and my faith in the promise of our great nation is renewed. Now, if there’s anything we gays know how to do well, it is to celebrate! Let the joy of this day ring out with PRIDE.
How do you personally feel about the DOMA ruling? (choose the closest one)
- It's about time! (44%, 60 Votes)
- I hope the church will steer clear of this type of political matter in future. (26%, 35 Votes)
- It's the end of marriage as we know it. (17%, 23 Votes)
- Meh. No dog in this fight. (12%, 16 Votes)
- Scuze me but what's DOMA? (1%, 1 Votes)
- I demand a refund for the money I put into Prop 8. (0%, 0 Votes)
Total Voters: 135
What statement will the church make about the DOMA ruling? (Choose the one you think is most accurate)
- A statement supporting anti-discrimination but not affirming gay marriage. (29%, 35 Votes)
- No statement at all. (26%, 31 Votes)
- A statement about the court overruling the voice of the people. (21%, 25 Votes)
- A statement reiterating the church's current pro-celibacy standpoint. (12%, 14 Votes)
- A statement warning about the slippery slope of tolerance. (9%, 11 Votes)
- A statement of outreach to gays. (3%, 3 Votes)
Total Voters: 119
What do you think members will say about this in your ward, if anything? What are people saying in your Facebook news feed?