I started reading twelve-step literature as a part of grief recovery.  It has not had much of an impact on my way of thinking about grief or recovery, but it has very much helped me think about God, completeness and healing.  It has also taught me lessons about honesty.

One of the core afflictions of addiction and addictive behavior is self-deception.  Resentment (usually of those you have wronged), self-deception and dishonesty all swirl around addictive behavior with drugs, gambling, sex, alcohol, anger, food (though, strange enough, there are no twelve-step programs to avoid rock & roll).

The antidote all of the various twelve-step programs have to the intrinsic dishonesty of their various addictions is the concept of a searching and fearless moral inventory, admitting wrongs, especially those that create resentments, and making both amends and admissions (to God, oneself and to other human beings).

You can see the threads of it in groups like the Arbringer Institute (source of the books Leadership and Self-Deception: Getting out of the Box and The Anatomy of Peace: Resolving the Heart of Conflict). Not only that, but early prophets in our dispensation talking about prayer and about what effective prayer requires and how to open oneself to inspiration are echoed in the twelve-step literature of half a century or more later.

The Anatomy of Peace: Resolving the Heart of Conflict + Leadership and Self-Deception: Getting out of the Box +

You can see the same threads in truly spiritual people (and the focus on the difference between spiritual people and religious people noted in many health care settings).

I’ve had some surprises though.  I’ve been surprised by the number of people who respond with anger or insult at the thought that holding on to resentment is a flaw of any kind or a barrier to God.  They don’t accept either the New Testament or the D&C where it says “Wherefore, I say unto you, that ye ought to forgive one another; for he that forgiveth not his brother his trespasses standeth condemned before the Lord; for there remaineth in him the greater sin.

When Christ called resentment for wrongs done to you a greater sin than the wrong, he was tapping into a truth about how resentment cuts us off from God.  Yet many complain that it is unfair to suggest that it is wrong to reject what Christ had to say.  That any belief that sins, especially resentments or anger, can interfere with our ability to feel the Spirit or hear from God is wrong — that anger and resentment obviously do not interfere with our connection to God.

My question is simpler than the Arbringer question (which is “what wrong have you committed against those you resent?”).  Rather, my question is whether or not it is wrong to reflect and consider the concept that holding on to resentments will create a barrier between us and God?  Is that something that extends beyond just those who are afflicted with addictive behavior?  Is there some special category of resentments and anger that is privileged so that it does not interfere, does not drive out charity and love? Will God really come in and sup with us if we purify ourselves of such things?

Is it possible to be spiritual and filled with resentment?  Or can you just be religious and filled with resentment (and if so, is your religion vain)? Do we really have to forgive all?  Why?