Prince of Peace Dies Violent Death

April 2, 2012

There is a call on the bloggernacle to talk about peace with us this week.  With Easter upon us, I wanted to talk a bit about the death of the Prince of Peace, who died a violent, tortured death.  Traditional images of the Crucifixion look similar to this one (pictured on the right.)  National Geographic has put together 10 videos in a 3-DVD set called Science of the Bible that looks into various aspects of the life of Jesus.  Episode 7 called “The Crucifixion” explores the death of Christ, and comes to some different conclusions than are traditional.

Most paintings (such as this one) depict Jesus with nails in his palms, but some have questioned whether these nails would have been strong enough to hold the body of Jesus.  Many Mormons believe that another nail was added to Jesus’ wrists because of the fear that the weight of Jesus would tear through the hands.  Experts on the video discuss this traditional theory.

In the 1930’s, French doctor Pierre Barbet performed some macabre experiments.  He nailed corpses to a cross.  Most artists portray Jesus nailed to the cross through the palms, but Barbet found this method problematic.  Nails through the palms could not support the weight of the body.  The only way to keep the corpse on the cross was to nail it through the wrists.

Frederick Zugibe, M.D., Author, The Crucifixion of Jesus: A Forensic Inquiry, “Barbet did that experiment with a freshly amputated arm, suspended weights on it, drove a nail through the palm, and said that the nail would pull through at 80 pounds with 10 minutes of shaking.”

Many have accepted this theory, butanother researcher has concluded that nails through the palms don’t need to support the entire weight of the body.  I’ll get to that in a minute, but want to ask a few other questions.

Is the cross really a T?

The most ancient image of the crucifixion dates to the 2nd century.  Dr Michael White, Professor of Classics, University of Texas describes the image.

This piece of grafiti is the oldest archaeological find related to the crucifixion of Jesus.  It is thought to date back to the 2nd century.

White, “This picture shows a crucified man, but with the head of a donkey facing away from us on the cross.”

This crude sketch in plaster written by a Greek slave in Rome was meant to ridicule an early follower of Christ.

White, “The man on the lower left is making a gesture of worship toward the man on the cross, and the inscription, which is in Greek says, ‘Aleximinos worships his God.'”

But it’s the cross itself which is most intriguing.  It’s low to the ground, it has a footrest, and it’s shaped like a flat-top T.  The T-shaped cross can have a vertical post permanently fixed to the ground, ideally suited for routine executions.”

The DVD then goes on to build both a traditionally shaped cross, as well as a T-shaped cross of materials that would have been available to Romans in Jesus’s day.  The “normal” cross would have weighed about 340 pounds, and would have been nearly impossible for Jesus to carry through the streets on the way to his execution.  However, if Jesus was carrying just the top part of the cross, it would have been much more manageable for him to carry.

White, “Jesus would have been made to carry the cross beam himself, probably over his shoulders, kind of like a yoke, maybe already even tied to it with ropes.”

Arriving at the place of execution just outside the city walls, he is then fixed to the cross.  Jesus’s rapid death strongly suggests he is not just tied but nailed.  But where do the nails go, and how many are there?  The icons overwhelmingly show three nails, one in each palm, and one passing through both feet.  This is not likely to be historically accurate.

Zias, “The reason they have three nails is that it represents theology: the Father, the Son, the Holy Ghost.  It doesn’t say whether Jesus was nailed with two nails, three nails, or four nails.”

The graffiti shows a footrest.  If such a footrest existed, then the palms would not have been needed to support the entire weight of the body.  Additionally, a T shaped cross would have been easier to for Romans to execute a prisoner than a traditional cross.

But it’s the cross itself which is most intriguing.  It’s low to the ground, it has a foot rest, and it’s shaped like a flat-top T.  The T-shaped cross can have a vertical post permanently fixed in the ground, ideal for routine executions.

[Workers lift T on top of vertical pole]  Hicks , “Ok, one, two, three.  Let’s go.”

The Romans could have designed the patibulum with a hole in it so that it would slip snugly on top of the support beam.  This mortise and tenon joint would have provided a simple and efficient process to get Jesus onto the cross.

Hicks, “As we’ve been exploring the evidence of how the cross was used and formed, we have realized the practicality of this joint.  It’s easy on and easy off.”

A slip-fit joint means that there is no need for nails and the cross can be re-used easily.

What of this footrest, or nails? Unlike the painting above, a crucifixion victim probably would have been straddling the vertical post.  Victims were often tied to the cross, but a startling discovery in 1968 found a crucifixion victim with a nail through the heel of his foot, rather than the top of the foot as shown in the painting above.

In 1968, archaeologist Vassilios Tzaferis [Head of Excavations, Israel Antiquities Authority] made an astounding discovery.  In tombs cut into the soft limestone, human bones can be found in stone boxes called ossuaries.

Tzaferis found a nail embedded in a heel bone of a man executed on a cross.

Joe Zias, Former Curator, Israel Antiquities Authority, “This is the right heel bone of a man in his 20’s.  When they nailed the man to the tree or to the cross, what happened you can see here was the soft iron nail probably struck a knot in the wood.  They took him down from the cross and tried to remove the nail, it was impossible, so this individual was buried with the nail in his foot.”

Physical Anthropologist Joe Zias has made the most in-depth study of Yehoanan bones.  He concluded this man could not have been crucified in the way shown in icons of Jesus.  This nail went through the side of the foot, not the front.

Zias, “What we believe happened was that they took a piece of olive wood, perhaps this size.  They took a nail.  The nail went through the olive wood and then once it went through the olive wood it then went through the heel, and then and only then was it attached to the tree.”

Zias next scrutinized the arms and hands of Yehoanan, looking for a tell-tale signs of a nail.

Zias, “Since there were no signs of traumatic change, it became clear evidence to us that this individual like many others had been simply tied to the cross.

Doctor Frederick Zugibe, M.D., Author, The Crucifixion of Jesus: A Forensic Inquiry has put together a special lab to study the crucifixion, and has come to some different conclusions that Pierre Barbet’s experiments of the 1930s.

Zugibe, “He didn’t die of asphyxiation.  The cause of death was cardiac and respiratory arrest due to hypovolemic and traumatic shock.”

Doctor Frederick Zugibe, a medical examiner, has studied crucifixion for over 50 years, and has built the only laboratory in the world that contains a crucifix.  He believes it can show why Jesus died.

Volunteer Steve Mandrogia on the cross, with Dr Zugibe and Dr Jonathan Reed in a special lab to study the crucifixion

Dr. Jonathan Reed, Professor of Religion, University of La Verne,”I think Doctor Zugibe is unique.  He’s really the only person with medical forensic knowledge to talk about the crucifixion.  In that sense, he’s one of a kind.”

Doctor Zugibe’s crucifixion rig monitors a subject’s vital signs, and with the help of an infrared camera he can also see how hard his muscles are working.  Overstrained muscle gets excessively hot, and will appear white on the infrared image. This allows doctor Zugibe to watch what happens inside a victim’s body when he’s on the cross.

The traditional crucifixion position has Jesus’s hands outstretched, and his feet attached to the front of the vertical post.  Doctor Zugibe has asked Steve Mandrogia to simulate being fixed to the cross in this posture.  Thanks to some specially designed quick-release gloves, Steve will not be in any danger.  [Zugibee describes gloves.]  The gloves connect to stress gauges that hang from nails on the cross.  These will help him track how much pull there is on Steve’s arms and shoulders.

Zugibee, “Now he’s polled at the lowest level there, and his feet flush.  This immediately puts most of the weight into this area [points to thighs].  “

Reed, “What’s the stress level now on his arms?”

Zugibe, “It’s in the 90’s.”

The gauges show moderate strain on each of Steve’s arms.  After 10 minutes on the cross, his blood oxygen is holding steady at 97%.

Reed, “Are you having any trouble breathing?”

Mandrogia, “No.”

Steve is in no danger of asphyxiating.

Zugibe, “Of the several hundred individuals we have put up on the cross, nobody ever had a problem breathing.”

And the infrared shows the strain on his upper body is barely causing his muscles to heat up.  A person tied to the cross in this position would not die quickly.  Next Jonathan proposes his theory of how Jesus was nailed to the cross based on the heel bone of Yehoanan who was crucified around the time of Jesus.

Reed, “What would happen if you didn’t have this post but there were two nails driven through the ankle into the beam? [film cuts ahead] Ok so the strain guage shows 20.”

Steve, “There’s almost no pressure on my shoulders right now in comparison to before.”

Steve’s blood oxygen is holding steady at a normal level.  Once again there is absolutely no danger of asphyxiation.”

Reed, “Asphysixation couldn’t have been the cause of death of crucifixion, and specifically with Jesus.  That’s been one of the things that’s been bandied about for almost a century, and I think it’s quite clear that you don’t.”

Doctor Zugibe’s experiments have excluded one cause of death.  Medical reasoning leads him to another.

Dramatization of nail in heel. Note the large washer made of olive wood to ensure the nails stays in place.

Zugibe, “There would be excruciating pain for the weight of the body on the nail.”

Reed, “Do you think the person would try to pull themselves up in this position?”

Zugibe, “They would attempt to, but they would get excruciating pain in the hands so that they could do very little to take the stress off of the feet.  [film cuts ahead] The nailing of the hands and feet are so brutal, it’s one of the worst pains ever experienced by man.”

According to Mark’s gospel, death came to Jesus in only six hours.

Mark 15:25, “It was the third hour when they crucified him…

Mark 15:34, “And at the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice”

Were the nails the cause of his rapid death?  Fixing human cadavers to a cross is no longer viable science.  But there is another way to investigate the gruesome anatomy of nailing.  The visible human project is a computer model of the human body that includes over 2000 anatomical structures.  With it, Doctor Vic Spitzer can drive a virtual Roman nail into the ankle bone of a virtual foot, and then track the damage.

Spitzer, “One of the major nerves is coming down the upper side of the ankle.  In order to get into the bone, we have to get into the periosteum, outside covering of the bone.  That’s where the pain receptors are.  The pain would be phenomenal!”

Such nerve damage would lead to traumatic shock which by itself can be fatal.  The slightest movement of the foot would cause immense pain.  And then there’s the hands, if they indeed were nailed.  Pierre Barbet’s cadaver tests argue that nails would rip out of the palms.  Barbet assumed a traditional crucifixion position and placed nearly 90 pounds of force on the arms.  But Doctor Zugibe’s test with the body in the position of Yehoanan showed there would only 20 pounds of weight on each nail.

Doctor Victor Spitzer, Director, Center for Human Simulation, “The hands are tough.  That’s why we’re able to use them the way we do.  Just putting a nail through the metacarpal bones, the long bones of the hand, the fibrous tissue alone ought to be able to support the weight of the arms and foreamrs against a wooden beam.”

The story of doubting Thomas does suggest Jesus was nailed through the palms.

John, 20:25, “Unless I see the nail marks of his hands and put my fingers where the nails were… I will not believe it.”

This would have caused horrific pain to Jesus.

Spitzer, “Severing the medial nerve is a highly likely possibility.  That kind of trauma to the body is hard to keep the body from going into shock.”

And as his hands pulled on the nails, he would begin to bleed, possibly profusely.

Spitzer, “There’s a good chance of having someone bleed to death by piercing an artery in the palm of the hand because that’s where the arteries are the densest, and that’s where the ulnar and radial artery are connecting.”

The medical prognosis for four nails wounds is dire and sure.  Their combined assault on the nerves and blood vessels would cause inexorable shutdown of body functions.  Pain would lead to traumatic shock and exhaustion.  Bleeding would take blood pressure dangerously low; eventually comes cardiac arrest.  This is the final piece of the puzzle.  Now what remains is to place these pieces together and attempt to depict with as much historical accuracy as possible what those final hours were like.

The crucifixion of Jesus; it has been depicted countless times.  What started as a scene from history has evolved into an icon of faith.  As a result of painstaking research, we can now begin to see the death of Jesus the way it really might have been.

Reed, “It’s not just the kind of thing you can read in an ancient book.  You have to experiment with it. You have to talk to experts in carpentry and in medicine and then begin to shape a picture of what happened in antiquity.

Our investigation is now ready to portray the last day of Jesus’s life. What you are about to see is not the absolute truth.  No one knows that for sure, but every single part of this reenactment is historically credible.

What do you make of this?  Do you think it is likely that a nail was added to his wrists?

Tags: , , , , ,

18 Responses to Prince of Peace Dies Violent Death

  1. Justin on April 2, 2012 at 7:35 AM

    What do you make of this? Do you think it is likely that a nail was added to his wrists?

    Unless I receive a vision of Christ on the cross that shows it to be otherwise — I’m going to be going with:

    When he was placed upon the cross, the crucifiers drove nails through the palms of his hands; then, fearing that the weight of his body would cause the nails to tear through the flesh of his hands, they drove nails through his wrists.

    when I keep the mental image of Christ on the cross always before me.

    Though — I have no reason to reject the placement of the nails to the heels, rather than the actual foot. If anything, the heel might be more likely because it sounds like it would have been more painful.

    Fan Favorite! Do you like this comment as well? Thumb up 4

  2. hawkgrrrl on April 2, 2012 at 7:58 AM

    I thought the symbolism was that no bones were broken in the process, like the passover lamb, so if that is requisite then nails through the heels are not perfectly symbolic. Nails through the wrist could go between the bones, so it would not require bone to be shattered or penetrated in the process.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 2

  3. Jeff Spector on April 2, 2012 at 8:11 AM

    I suspect there were different methodologies to hanging people by crosses. It has always been clear to me that the traditional depiction was incorrect. The LDS view might be closer, but who knows?

    What has always intrigued me is how Jesus could tell people to take up their crosses (Matt 16)when it was not clear how he would die or if the people would even understand such a comment.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  4. Bob on April 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM

    OP:Mormon Heretic,
    I don’t think this should change anyone’s feelings about the Crucifixion of Jesus.
    Odd however that the Crucifixion of Jesus is now being defined by the Secular world.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  5. hawkgrrrl on April 2, 2012 at 8:51 AM

    Jeff – or that’s a misattribution to Jesus or something said after his crucifixion, etc., etc.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 2

  6. Jeff Spector on April 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM

    HG,

    Ya think? :)

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  7. Mormon Heretic on April 2, 2012 at 10:20 AM

    Yes Justin, I know that is a familiar thought among Mormons (and I believe it is taught in the temple), but what if there was no reason that the Romans had to fear “that the weight of his body would cause the nails to tear through the flesh of his hands”? Dr Zugibe’s research leads us to believe that if there was a footrest or if the heels were nailed (or both), there would have been little stress on the hands; hence little reason to believe that the nail would tear through the flesh of the hands.

    Jeff, I agree. The film makes it clear that many crucifixion victims were simply tied to the cross, and they victims were up there for days. With the nails inducing shock, it is likely that is why Jesus lasted just hours.

    However, I crucifixion was a quite common mode of execution at the time of Jesus. If Jesus made such a comment, I think the people in Matt 16 would have understood such a comment.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  8. Bob on April 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM

    Pliny the Elder (Roman Historian), was in Jerusalem during the Crucifixion of Christ, but reported no dark skies(?)

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  9. Justin on April 2, 2012 at 12:59 PM

    Researchers can verify and validate many different scenarios. And since there were various ways Romans placed people onto crosses — I’m sure many of them are valid scenarios.

    Zugibe’s particular model is certainly internally consistent — but does rely on:

    if there was a footrest or if the heels were nailed

    If that was not the case, then their scenario is scrapped.

    So — unless nails in the wrists is undisputedly ruled-out [which is hasn't], I’m going to stick with picturing the image that the tokens present to me.

    I don’t mind saying the temple ritual is speaking in some metaphorical way [rather than telling us where His nails were actually placed, physically] — but I’d like to have sufficient reason for doing so.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 3

  10. Mormon Heretic on April 2, 2012 at 3:21 PM

    But Justin, I think we all agree that the feet of Jesus feet were nailed to the cross. If you look at the artist’s depiction in the OP, it just doesn’t seem to work that his feet were nailed through the top. On the other hand, nailing through the heel not only has the precedent of another man shown above, but it seems to make much more sense from a practical point of view. As such, it doesn’t seem that there was all that much strain on his hands, though I’d hate to have a nail in my hand. I’m sure the pain was excruciating.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  11. LDS Anarchist on April 2, 2012 at 5:46 PM

    Okay, let’s assume that Jesus’ feet were nailed to the sides of the vertical beams through the heels. (Not the bones of the heels, for that would break or fracture the heel bone, and no bone in his body was broken, but through the meat of the heel, so that the nail became a sort of stirrup, upon which Jesus could stand, or rest his weight upon, the heel and other bones of the foot applying downward pressure upon the nail going through, not below the foot.)

    Now, such a scenario does not indicate that pressure is taken off of the arms, because in order for the arms to not bear all the weight, weight must bear upon the feet, and in order to do that, Jesus must use his quadriceps to keep the legs straight and stand upon the “stirrups.” However, given the pain going through the pierced nerves of that area of the foot, the effort to stand upon the nails would cause increased pain. The likelihood, then, is that Jesus would attempt to stand to relieve the pain of the nails going through the nerves at the wrists (which pain would increase if he relaxed his legs) and he would relax his legs to relieve the pain going through the nerves at his heels.

    So, we end up with a constantly fidgeting Savior, flexing and relaxing his legs muscles for six straight hours to obtain some measure of relief from the pierced nerves at the wrists and ankles. The legs are the only body parts that he can move. At times nearly his full body weight is upon the wrist nails and at other times nearly his entire body weight is upon the heel nails.

    One other thing to keep in mind is that after the suffering in the garden, in which he bled at evey pore, his skin would have been entirely blood-stained. (I’m not sure that he had any opportunity to wash up.) When he was arrested, with the subsequent trials, etc., every person who looked upon him must have thought he was as guilty as a man could possibly be. As in patently, obviously guilty, for he had “blood on his hands” (and everywhere else,) yet there was no indication that it was his own blood.

    So, the Roman soldiers, stripping him and seeing that he was covered in blood, (“obviously” someone else’s blood,) may have decided to give him the scourging of a lifetime. In their eyes, this man not only deserved to die, but in the most horrible way possible. So, in choosing how to crucify him, they chose the most painful way possible. No rope tying for Jesus. For him it would be nails through the nerves of the wrists and the heels. No mercy for such a man covered in blood…

    Fan Favorite! Do you like this comment as well? Thumb up 4

  12. Bob on April 2, 2012 at 7:20 PM

    #11:LDS Anarchist,
    I guess you see Romans as pretty evil guys? I don’t see Bible history showing that.
    Also, why was there a need to have Jesus pointed out in the Garden (to the Romans), if he was such a bloody mess?

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  13. Mormon Heretic on April 2, 2012 at 10:15 PM

    I know that we try to look at the “Synoptic” gospels and try to make everything fit, but it just seems really hard.

    Let’s assume that Jesus bled from every pore. Was that a small bit of blood, or did he look like he was a Texas-chainsaw massacre victim? Well, I vote the former.

    When Judas came to betray him, there didn’t seem to be a lot of revulsion of Jesus looking all bloody, so I’d be more comfortable with not a lot of blood. When Peter cut off the ear of the guard, Jesus did heal the ear of the Roman, so perhaps he got some blood on his hand during the miracle.

    Even if he was covered in blood, I’m pretty sure he would have been ritually unclean, and the San Hedrin would have probably required him to be cleaned up. (I’m not an expert here, so please correct me if I am wrong.) His trials before the San Hedrin and Pilate fail to note a bloody mess, so I don’t think we should read too much into this.

    Then he was scourged. After that, he probably looked quite bloodied, and terrible. In the documentary, they said that capital punishment victims often stayed on the cross for days, because of the deterrent effect for others. So, nailing Jesus would have caused more pain, but a quicker death. Perhaps a quicker death was suggested by Jews because they didn’t want to have Christ die on the Sabbath. In that sense, perhaps it was a less tortured death because it was shorter. But the catch is that it would be more painful for the shorter time.

    There seems to be a popular myth among Christians that Christ died of asphyxiation, due to the French doctor Barbet’s work in the 1930’s suggesting that Jesus would tire of filling his lungs with oxygen. However, Dr Zugibe’s work seems more convincing to me–shock due to hitting painful nerves would induce death much quicker. As stated before, many people lived on the cross for days before dying, so asphyxiation in just 6 hours seems unlikely to me.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  14. andrew h on April 2, 2012 at 11:29 PM

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2012/04/02/agnoy-of-crucifixion_n_1386087.html?icid=hp_politics_art_related

    I found this Huffington Post article on “The Agony of Crucifixion” interesting and feel it fits well with the discussion here

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  15. LDS Anarchist on April 2, 2012 at 11:52 PM

    Many years ago, I recall listening to a talk on the atonement in which the speaker claimed that bleeding from the pores was an actual, but very rare, medical condition, which afflicted certain people in only certain areas of the body. I believe he mentioned the hands as an area and I cannot recall the other areas. Unfortunately, I don’t remember the guy’s name, or qualifications. But I do remember what he said about the condition, namely, that after the person bled through the skin, it (the skin) became hyper-sensitive, so that even blowing on it would cause excruciating pain.

    Now, if that is true, and given that Jesus said he bled from every pore (in D&C 19:18), He would already have been in dire straits after the suffering in the garden. In other words, bleeding from every pore is, perhaps, sufficient pain and shock to the system to kill a mortal man, so Christ was likely using His divine power to remain alive from the garden to the final moments on the cross.

    Fan Favorite! Do you like this comment as well? Thumb up 4

  16. Mormon Heretic on April 3, 2012 at 12:06 AM

    LDSA, I think I remember that too–I think it may have been Elder Nelson, the doctor apostle. I’m not denying it, but one begins to question the different portrayals of Jesus. Luke 22:44 has Jesus in agony, but then John 18:10 has Jesus rebuking Peter for cutting off the ear, and then healing the man–two strikingly different Jesuses, and it begins to seem hard to reconcile the two. Was he weak from the atonement, or strong in from of Roman/Jewish leaders. He certainly seemed strong-willed in the face of the San Hedrin and Pilate. Are these two writers talking about the same man?

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  17. Justin on April 3, 2012 at 7:32 AM

    Are these two writers talking about the same man?

    Bart Ehrman’s research concluded that the sweating blood account in Luke represents a later scribal addition to the text — because the scribe felt that either one or both of the following wasn’t emphasized well enough by the writer of Luke: (1) Jesus doesn’t seem to suffer all that much [without the blood-sweating in there]. (2) Some were teaching an non-corporal Christ [not actually flesh and blood].

    I always try to keep in mind that the same desire to:

    try to look at the “Synoptic” gospels and try to make everything fit

    is the same desire that was behind correlating church manuals and doctrine.

    As if something is just terribly wrong if admit that the community of believers who used the book of Luke thought something differently about the death of Christ than what the believers who used the book of Mark [or John or Matthew] thought.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 3

  18. MH on April 8, 2012 at 5:13 PM

    The church has an interesting video out on Easter. If you look at the 4:55 mark, Jesus is standing on a platform on the cross, and has nails through the hands and wrists. See http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/easter-message-first-presidency-2012

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

Archives

%d bloggers like this: